Components of Collaboration

Collaboration can be defined as working together to achieve a common purpose. Examining that definition, we see that collaboration involves (a) two or more people, (b) one or more shared goals, and (c) co-ordination of activity. Let’s consider an example:

I and three other people are sitting around a heavy table. The table is in a small, uncomfortable room, and I wish it were in a different room. After thinking this for a while, I say aloud “I wish this table were in a different room,” and then the other three people say in turn “So do I,” “Me too,” and “Me as well.” After some discussion, we agree we should move the table from room A to room B — and since it’s a heavy table, we agree we should do it together. However, getting from room A to room B requires going through a complex series of passages and only one person is familiar with the layout of the building we’re in, so we decide that person should lead us when we move the table. After further discussion, two of us stand on one side of the table and two on the opposite side. Our leader asks if everyone is ready, and everyone nods. When she says “OK” and begins to lift, the rest of us lift as well. We pick up the table and begin to walk, following the directions of our leader. When we get to a certain point in room B, our leader says”How about here?” and each person nods. Together we lower the table until it stands on the floor, and we congratulate each other on a job well done.

This simple example illustrates several things:

A goal becomes a shared goal when people believe it to be so. We might have four people sitting around a table, each wanting that table to be in room B rather than in room A, but that is not enough to make it a shared goal. We each may have reasons to suppose that everyone else would rather have the table in room B, but that still is not enough to make it a shared goal. What’s needed is some way for each person to know or have some reason to suppose that everyone else knows or supposes that everyone wants the table to be in room B rather than in room A.

Achieving a shared goal usually requires a plan. The process of planning may require translating an abstract goal into something more concrete and breaking a high-level goal down into a set of sub-goals that can be achieved by a specific set of actions. In our example, the group moves from the abstract goal of having the table in a different room to the more concrete goal of moving the table from room A to room B. The group also identifies a sub-goal of finding a path from room A to room B and assigns responsibility for this to one group member.

It’s not necessary for everyone involved to have the same knowledge of a plan. In the example above, one person knows how the group will get from room A to room B, while the other three only need to know that they will do as directed by the one who knows how to navigate. People involved in a collaboration often have differing knowledge and differing abilities. Identifying roles and assigning responsibilities is part of the planning process, and that process may include assigning someone the role of leader and the responsibility for further identifying roles and assigning responsibilities.

The actions required to execute a collaborative plan can be co-ordinated through a combination of communication and awareness of what others are doing. While walking together, group members co-ordinated their pace by watching each other. In addition, a combination of verbal and non-verbal communication helped them to lift the table together, move in the right direction, and then put the table down together.

In summary, a successful collaboration typically involves (1) the identification of shared goals, (2) the formulation of action plans, (3) the assignment of roles and responsibilities, and (4) the co-ordination of activities through communication and mutual awareness.

 

The Mock Trial Program

The following information about the Mock Trial Program was provided by the FVHS Mock Trial Team attorney coach for inclusion in the original public website.

History of the Mock Trial Program

In 1980, Constitutional Rights Foundation (CRF) introduced the Mock Trial program to help students acquire a working knowledge of our judicial system, develop analytical abilities and communication skills, and gain an understanding of their obligations and responsibilities as participating members of our society. The program currently involves 36 California counties and actively engages over 8,000 student-participants across the state.  The winners of the county competitions go on to the State Finals in March, and the winner of the state competition represents California at the annual National High School Mock Trial Competition in May.

Structure of the Mock Trial Program

Each year, CRF creates and produces a new set of Mock Trial materials based on an important issue facing America’s youth. The materials include a hypothetical criminal case including summaries of case law, witness statements, official exhibits, and simplified rules of evidence.

Teams of students prepare and present the trial from the perspectives of both the prosecution and the defense.  Each team is comprised of a maximum of 20 students (including alternates), and a typical team would be divided into 2 sides, Prosecution and Defense, as follows:

1 pretrialattorney
3 trial attorneys
4 witnesses
1 clerk or bailiff
1 alternate

Advantages of Participation in the Mock Trial Program

With the assistance of a teacher coach and attorney coach the students learn to work in a team environment as they analyze the case materials, exchange ideas, and prepare strategies and arguments for trial.  Formal surveys of teachers report significant improvement in students’ basic skills, critical thinking skills, presentations skills, participation skills, and self-esteem as well as increases in students’ content knowledge about the law.  Top competitors receive awards and scholarships in recognition of their outstanding performances.

The Case Study Method

Featured

This website has been created to present a case study in collaboration based on a retrospective analysis of notes and usage data from the 2008 and 2009 periods during which the website and collaborative space for the FVHS Mock Trial Team were in active development and use. In addition, the recollections of the attorney coach and selected team members may be drawn upon to fill in gaps and provide additional information.

Collaboration can take many forms. Consequently, the needs of people working together towards a shared goal can vary, as can the processes and tools they select to facilitate their collaboration. It is important to be mindful that the conclusions we can draw from a single case study will be limited. Nevertheless, case studies can contribute to our understanding of complex social activities which cannot be examined fully by controlled research in which variables are carefully manipulated.

At present, this website is a work in progress, still in the early stages. As seems appropriate, individual pages and posts — including this post — may be edited and updated to fit the evolving structure and content of the website.